<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baseball&#039;s Ridiculous Realignment Plan Is Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/</link>
	<description>Satisfying Your Daily Sports Fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 10:31:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>David Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/?p=588#comment-548</guid>
		<description>SEO&#124; Internet Marketing&#124; Website Designing
 
Hi

We are leading SEO service provider and web Development Company. We are expert in PHP,.NET, and many open sources like Joomla, Drupal, Wordpress, Oscommerse ,Zencart and Blog Management. We offer best of quality work to our clients at the lowest possible prices. We can quickly promote your website.

We can place your website on top of the Natural Listings on Google, Yahoo and MSN. We do not use &quot;&quot;link farms&quot;&quot; or &quot;&quot;black hat&quot;&quot; methods that Google and the other search engines frown upon and can use to de-list or ban your site. . Price is never a constraint with us because we take pride in handling challenging work.

We would be happy to send you best fit proposal for web development and designing and if you have a SEO requirement we will send you a proposal using the top search phrases for your area of expertise.

In order for us to respond to your request for information, please include your company’s website address (mandatory) and /or phone number.

Sincerely,
David Scott
davidinternetmarketing010@gmail.com
COMPLETE INTERNET MARKETING SOLUTION
SEO-LinkBuilding-Copyright-Web Desiging-PHP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO| Internet Marketing| Website Designing</p>
<p>Hi</p>
<p>We are leading SEO service provider and web Development Company. We are expert in PHP,.NET, and many open sources like Joomla, Drupal, Wordpress, Oscommerse ,Zencart and Blog Management. We offer best of quality work to our clients at the lowest possible prices. We can quickly promote your website.</p>
<p>We can place your website on top of the Natural Listings on Google, Yahoo and MSN. We do not use &#8220;&#8221;link farms&#8221;" or &#8220;&#8221;black hat&#8221;" methods that Google and the other search engines frown upon and can use to de-list or ban your site. . Price is never a constraint with us because we take pride in handling challenging work.</p>
<p>We would be happy to send you best fit proposal for web development and designing and if you have a SEO requirement we will send you a proposal using the top search phrases for your area of expertise.</p>
<p>In order for us to respond to your request for information, please include your company’s website address (mandatory) and /or phone number.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
David Scott<br />
<a href="mailto:davidinternetmarketing010@gmail.com">davidinternetmarketing010@gmail.com</a><br />
COMPLETE INTERNET MARKETING SOLUTION<br />
SEO-LinkBuilding-Copyright-Web Desiging-PHP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/?p=588#comment-169</guid>
		<description>i agree with 8 playoff teams in each league...send your idea to Bud light</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with 8 playoff teams in each league&#8230;send your idea to Bud light</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curveballz</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>curveballz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/?p=588#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Good points being made all around - but I think you could probably shave a week off of spring training and load the home schedules in those first few weeks towards the more temperate climates.  I agree that shortening the season won&#039;t fly at all with the greed in the game today.  If u went with the 6-team playoff structure, including byes, the opening round would have to be a best-of-3, as too much time off in baseball isn&#039;t necessarily an advantage but actually can be a disadvantage (get out of the flow, etc).  8 teams per league would still only amount to just over 50% of teams making it to the playoffs... personally, I&#039;d rather see more weak sisters at least have a chance to go than less.  6 teams likely still wouldn&#039;t allow for teams like KC, Oakland and Toronto to ever have a shot at making it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points being made all around &#8211; but I think you could probably shave a week off of spring training and load the home schedules in those first few weeks towards the more temperate climates.  I agree that shortening the season won&#8217;t fly at all with the greed in the game today.  If u went with the 6-team playoff structure, including byes, the opening round would have to be a best-of-3, as too much time off in baseball isn&#8217;t necessarily an advantage but actually can be a disadvantage (get out of the flow, etc).  8 teams per league would still only amount to just over 50% of teams making it to the playoffs&#8230; personally, I&#8217;d rather see more weak sisters at least have a chance to go than less.  6 teams likely still wouldn&#8217;t allow for teams like KC, Oakland and Toronto to ever have a shot at making it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gallay</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Gallay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/?p=588#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan, I always like a good Bud Selig-bashing but that &quot;the committee&quot; is thinking about the parity issue does count for something since they have overlooked this willfully for more than a decade. I also look at your suggestions for improvement and think they need to be fine-tuned. You can&#039;t shorten spring training because lots of teams struggle to host games in April; can you imagine Cleveland in March? Shortening the season won&#039;t fly because it hits at the pocketbooks of the owners. You also don&#039;t need 8 teams to make it interesting; baseball does not need to emulate the yaaaawwwwnnn early rounds of hockey and basketball. The format should move to 6 teams per league. The top two get byes. The next two host the bottom two in 5-game series; even 3-game series if it&#039;s all the schedule would allow. With some tighter playoff scheduling this could be accomplished and would provide hope to the AL Leasters. Striking a balance between giving hope to the middling franchises while preserving the relative high-ground that is entry into the baseball playoffs is the key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan, I always like a good Bud Selig-bashing but that &#8220;the committee&#8221; is thinking about the parity issue does count for something since they have overlooked this willfully for more than a decade. I also look at your suggestions for improvement and think they need to be fine-tuned. You can&#8217;t shorten spring training because lots of teams struggle to host games in April; can you imagine Cleveland in March? Shortening the season won&#8217;t fly because it hits at the pocketbooks of the owners. You also don&#8217;t need 8 teams to make it interesting; baseball does not need to emulate the yaaaawwwwnnn early rounds of hockey and basketball. The format should move to 6 teams per league. The top two get byes. The next two host the bottom two in 5-game series; even 3-game series if it&#8217;s all the schedule would allow. With some tighter playoff scheduling this could be accomplished and would provide hope to the AL Leasters. Striking a balance between giving hope to the middling franchises while preserving the relative high-ground that is entry into the baseball playoffs is the key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedWings83-Present</title>
		<link>http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/2010/03/11/mlb-realignment-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>RedWings83-Present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesportsjunkie.ca/?p=588#comment-166</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail on the head TSJ. For us fans of non Yankees or Bosox teams the end of the season each year is getting pretty old and pretty predictable. I have the most interest at the beginning of the season then gradually as the big horses pull away and the playoffs become an impossibility I tend to watch less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head TSJ. For us fans of non Yankees or Bosox teams the end of the season each year is getting pretty old and pretty predictable. I have the most interest at the beginning of the season then gradually as the big horses pull away and the playoffs become an impossibility I tend to watch less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

