NHL Playoffs: Why Winning The Presidents’ Trophy Cost The Capitals

NHL Playoffs: Why Winning The Presidents’ Trophy Cost The Capitals

The date was January 21st, 2010 and the Washington Capitals were at the top of the Eastern Conference. Coming off a 6-3 win over their arch rivals the Pittsburgh Penguins, the Capitals appeared as though they were destined for a long and prosperous playoff run come April. Washington was flying high – winners of five in a row, the highest scoring team in the NHL, owners of the league’s top powerplay and their superstar, you know, that Russian guy whose won all those awards? Yeah, he was doing okay. First in plus-minus, second in scoring, 18 points in eight straight games. Obvious statement of the day: Alex Ovechkin and the Caps were among the league’s best and beating Sidney Crosby and the Pens? That was the icing on the cake.

Ovie Says Goodbye After Round 1

President’s Trophy Offers Little Reward For NHL’s Top Teams

Flash forward four months to Wednesday night, Washington’s season ends in a way no one could’ve expected, a heartbreaking seventh game loss to the eighth-seeded Montreal Canadiens. In 60 frustrating minutes, 82 games of excellence was flushed down the proverbial toilet and for what? The Presidents’-freakin’ Trophy!

What was Washington’s reward for 54-regular season wins, a Southeast Division title and 121 regular season points? One more home game in a seven game series! Yeah, that makes it allllll worth it.

You know, Caps head coach Bruce Boudreau actually saw this coming on that fateful night in January against the Penguins. And in the process, he described exactly what’s wrong with the NHL’s regular season:

“We were 3-0-1 against them [the Penguins in the regular season] last year and it didn’t mean a hill of beans,”
Boudreau said. “The first couple of times I could only watch (the tape of Game 7 [versus the Pens in the playoffs]) until they scored their first goal, but then I gutted it out and watched it all.”

Boudreau should probably avoid watching the tape of Wednesday night’s Game 7 too.

Look, with all due respect to Jarolsav Halak and the Habs, who are full credit for their upset of the Capitals, all those regular season wins racked up by Washington “didn’t mean a hill of beans.”

Halak's Habs Finished 33 Points Behind Washington

NHL Needs To Consider Playoff Restructuring

Is a playoff system that rewards the best team in the league with one meager additional playoff home game (the fourth and final home date in a seven game series) – as its ‘congratulations’ for 82 games of hard work – a proportionally representative way to say ‘thanks’?

While certainly not the ideal example, Major League Baseball might actually have the best playoff model. Only the best teams (eight in total) qualify for the postseason in baseball and when the New York Yankees lose in the playoffs – in all likelihood, they do so against another elite squad like the Boston Red Sox – not a club [see the Montreal Canadiens] that eeked into the second season by winning less than half of their total games.

There’s justice in losing to a team that worked just as hard as you to get to the dance.

But there’s frustration, one can imagine as a player, in knowing that over 82 regular season matches, you could’ve cared a little less, scored fewer times and given the paying customer another reason to boo – and for what? A trip to the second round of the playoffs and a chance to win the Cup.

Sounds backwards, no?

The Presidents’ Trophy? For the Capitals, it didn’t mean a hill of beans.

We’d love to hear your thoughts on what works or doesn’t work about the NHL playoff format. Agree? Disagree? Let’s hear from you.

Click here to become a Fan of The Sports Junkie on Facebook

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz